In 2017, the court approved a $52 million settlement, resolving claims against the dairy industry related to its conspiracy to fix the price of milk via the premature slaughtering of dairy cattle.

Case Status
Settled
Motion to Dismiss Denied (In Full or in Part)
Class Certified
Settlement Value
$52 Million
Position
Class Counsel
Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Judge Assigned
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
Case Number
11-CV-04766
Defendant(S)
National Milk Producers Federation
Dairy Farmers of America
Land O'Lakes, Inc.
Agri-Mark, Inc.
Cooperatives Working Together (CWT)
File Date

Hagens Berman filed a class-action antitrust lawsuit against several large players in the dairy industry, including the National Milk Producers Federation, Dairy Farmers of America, Land O’Lakes, Inc., Agri-Mark, Inc. and Cooperatives Working Together (CWT) alleging that the groups conspired to fix the price of milk throughout the United States.

CWT is a massive trade group representing dairy producers throughout the country who produce nearly 70 percent of the milk consumed in the United States.

The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on Sept. 26, 2011, alleged that between 2003 and 2010, more than 500,000 cows were slaughtered prematurely under CWT’s dairy herd retirement program in a concerted effort to reduce the supply of milk and inflate its price nationally. According to the complaint, the increased price allowed CWT members to earn more than $9 billion in additional revenue.

The case was initially researched and developed by Compassion Over Killing, a national animal protection organization.

Dairy herd retirement ended in the summer of 2010, but CWT’s tactics may affect the price of milk for years, according to the lawsuit. Hagens Berman is interested in speaking to consumers who purchased milk or milk products from 2004 to the present. 

Compassion Over Killing released additional information about the case, which can be found at http://www.cok.net/camp/inv/dairy-price-fixing.

CASE TIMELINE

Settlement Update

Funds are being distributed to class members who claimed a portion of the $52 million settlement.

Settlement Reached

Consumers in 15 states and the District of Columbia who purchased dairy products are now entitled to a portion of a $52 million settlement.

If you purchased milk or other fresh milk products (cream, half and half, yogurt, cottage cheese, cream cheese, or sour cream) while a resident of Arizona, California, the District of Columbia, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia or Wisconsin at any point between 2003 to the present, you may be eligible for reimbursement.

CASE UPDATE

The Court approved the settlement, but an objector filed an appeal.  And the settlement funds cannot be distributed until this appeal is resolved.  Briefing deadlines for this appeal were recently set for October and November of 2018.  So hopefully the appeal will be resolved within the next year and then distribution of the settlement funds can commence.

Court Grants Final Approval of $52M Dairy Price-Fixing Settlement

On June 26, 2017, the court granted final approval of the class-action settlement, which allows funds to be issued to consumers.

Settlement Update: Awaiting Court's Approval

"The $52 million settlement that came from the milk antitrust lawsuit is very much real and stemmed from a harsh reality –  that the country’s largest dairy conglomerates needlessly, prematurely slaughtered 500,000 cows solely to boost prices and generate profit. Now that the settlement has been reached, we look forward to the court issuing a final ruling on the settlement soon, after which consumers will begin receiving payments. Consumers who are waiting for their reimbursement can also contact the settlement administrator via the boughtmilk.com website to check on the status of their claim."

—Steve Berman, Managing Partner

Settlement Claims Period Ends

Class is Certified

Motion to Dismiss Denied

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.