Judge Denies Boeing Motion to Dismiss Class Action; Case Alleging Boeing Misled Shareholders Will Proceed


SEATTLE – In a 31-page order issued late today, US District Judge Thomas S. Zilly denied a motion brought by The Boeing Company to dismiss a pending class action suit filed against the company on October 31, 1997 by Seattle attorney Steve Berman on behalf of investors in Boeing stock. The judge also ruled that other portions of the complaint did not meet a sufficient burden of proof, but could be filed again with the court.

The original suit alleges, among other claims, that Boeing executives Phil Condit, Boyd E. Givan and former Boeing executive Ron Woodard knowingly made false and misleading statements to the public about Boeing's production problems in order to effect a merger with McDonnell Douglas Corp.

In today's order Judge Zilly concluded that investors have sufficiently plead that Boeing executives knew or should have known their statements were false. Zilly also ruled that the portions of the complaint dealing with Boeing's accounting methods were not sufficient, and ordered them dismissed, but left the door open for refiling.

"Obviously, we are pleased with the ruling," Berman said. "We are very eager to more forward with discovery and prove what we believed all along, that Boeing misled shareholders. We are very much looking forward to reviewing the production records and deposing those involved."

"The ruling means that Boeing can't hide from what they've said on the record," Berman said.

According to the complaint, Boeing failed to disclose critical production problems that were documented internally, including the following:

  • Contracts bid at dangerously low margins.
  • Manufacturing plagued with serious deficiencies stemming from production flaws.
  • Chronic failure to order parts and internal under-reporting of parts shortages due to corporate procedures.
  • Persistent problems in the parts supply chain that could not be remedied in time to prevent huge losses.

Berman said he expects to augment the claims involving the accounting practices and re-file those sections of the complaint in the future.

# # #

About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP is a consumer-rights class-action law firm with offices in nine cities. The firm has been named to the National Law Journal’s Plaintiffs’ Hot List seven times. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

Ashley Klann

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.

Back to all cases