EA/Madden NFL Video Game Development

DEFENDANT NAME: Electronic Arts
STOCK SYMBOL: NASDAQ: EA
CASE NUMBER: 11-cv-01543
CASE NAME:
COURT: U.S. District Court
STATUS: Settled
CLASS PERIOD:
LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE:
DATE FILED: 03/30/11
COURT LOCATION:
RELATED DOCUMENTS:
CONTACT:
206-623-7292

Trial Victory

Hagens Berman's legal team prevailed against EA in trial. The court then vacated the judgment, which was appealed by Hagens Berman. The appeal is pending in the ninth circuit.  

After more than two years of legal maneuvering by Electronic Arts (NASDAQ: EA), a California federal judge has denied EA's final attempt to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Robin Antonick, who, according to the lawsuit, was the original designer and developer of its best-selling video-game Madden NFL.

Antonick is seeking millions in allegedly unpaid royalties, punitive damages and disgorgement of all profits arising from the $5 billion Madden NFL franchise and related sports videogames, according to court filings. 

Antonick, according to the lawsuit, conceived and developed the first version of John Madden Football for the Commodore 64, MS-DOS and Apple II platforms. The game was the first to accurately simulate 11x11 football, among other advances, and was described as “miraculous” by EA. 

The case alleges that EA and Antonick signed a series of publishing and development contracts, culminating in a 1986 agreement that requires EA to pay him royalties on any derivative works related to the original version of EA Madden, including current annual releases. The lawsuit claims that EA has failed to pay millions of dollars in royalties owed to Antonick and failed to keep his work confidential as required by the contract.

“We have very compelling evidence indicating that EA used Mr. Antonick’s ground-breaking code and design elements as the basis for both past and present Madden NFL titles,” said Robert Carey, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP partner and one of Antonick’s attorneys. “Yet, EA has failed to compensate him as required by his agreement or give him proper credit for his work. We look forward to proving our case at trial, and we are very confident that we will prevail.”

Antonick is also represented by Leonard Aragon of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and Stuart Paynter of the Paynter Law Firm.


Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.

Back to all cases

Contact:

Please fill out the form below and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
 
*
*
*
Preferred Contact Method *
*
*
*
Select a State *
*
How Did You Hear About This Case/Investigation? *
How Has This Issue Affected You? *
*
*
 

Case videos

Case Gallery

Case Timeline

08/30/15: Trial Victory

Hagens Berman's legal team prevailed against EA in trial. The court then vacated the judgment, which was appealed by Hagens Berman. The appeal is pending in the ninth circuit.  

Related News