Practice Areas

This is a securities fraud class action against JOYY Inc. f/k/a YY, Inc. (“JOYY” or the “Company”) and its most senior executives, filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired JOYY securities between April 28, 2016 and November 18, 2020 (the “Class Period”).

Practice Areas

Hagens Berman has filed a class-action lawsuit alleging that Facebook gained an illegal monopoly by exploiting and selling user data. We believe Facebook utilized its own user data to identify emerging threats to its social-media monopoly without properly compensating consumers – or letting them know the extent to which their personal information was being used.

Hagens Berman filed a class-action lawsuit claiming that Amazon.com colluded with the “Big Five,” five of the nation’s largest publishers, including Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Macmillan Publishers, Penguin Group Inc. and Simon & Schuster Inc., to illegally fix prices of electronic books, also known as e-books, forcing consumers to pay higher prices.

Practice Areas

This is a securities fraud class action against Blink Charging Co. (“Blink” or the “Company”) and certain of the Company’s senior executives (collectively, “Defendants”). The lawsuit is brought on behalf of investors who purchased Blink securities between March 6, 2020 and August 19, 2020 (the “Class Period”).

Practice Areas

This is a securities fraud class action brought on behalf of investors who purchased Crown Castle International Corp. (“Crown Castle”) securities between February 26, 2018 and February 26, 2020, inclusive (the “Class Period”). 

Crown Castle is a Real Estate Investment Trust that owns and leases roughly 40,000 cell towers in the U.S.  Crown Castle generates revenue by leasing space on its towers to wireless service providers and servicing equipment installed on the towers to support their clients’ wireless networks.

Practice Areas

This is a securities fraud class action brought on behalf investors who purchased Vaxart, Inc. (“Vaxart” or the “Company”) securities between June 25, 2020 and August 19, 2020, inclusive (the “Class Period”). The action alleges claims under the federal securities laws against Vaxart, a clinical-stage vaccine developer, its senior executives, Board members, and controlling shareholder Armistice.

Practice Areas

This is a securities class action on behalf of investors who purchased securities of OneSpan, Inc. (“OneSpan” or the “Company”) from May 9, 2018, to August 11, 2020 (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover damages caused by OneSpan and certain of its senior officers’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

One lawsuit is against the manufacturers of PFAS – 3M, DuPont and several of its affiliated companies – and focuses on contamination caused by PFAS in consumer, household, and other commercial products, as well as industrial uses.  State of Vermont v. 3M Co., No. 547-6-19 Cncv (Vt. Super. Ct.).  The second lawsuit names the manufacturers of fire-fighting foam containing PFAS as well as a company that supplied ingredients containing PFAS to the foam manufacturers and addresses contamination caused by PFAS in fire-fighting foam.  State of Vermont v. 3M Co., No. 2:19-cv-00134 (D.