Did you buy e-books since 2017? Hagens Berman filed a class action lawsuit against Amazon accusing it of establishing an illegal monopoly of the e-books market and charging artificially inflated prices. Fill out the form to find out your rights »

Case Status
Active
Motion to Dismiss Denied (In Full or in Part)
Case Caption
In Re Amazon.com, Inc. Ebook Antitrust Litgation
Position
Co-Lead Counsel
Court
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Case Number
1:21-cv-00351
Defendant(S)
Amazon.com Inc.
Hachette Book Group Inc.
Harpercollins Publishers LLC
Macmillan Publishing Group LLC
Penguin Random House LLC
Simon & Schuster Inc.
File Date

Hagens Berman filed a class-action lawsuit claiming that Amazon.com colluded with the “Big Five,” five of the nation’s largest publishers, including Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Macmillan Publishers, Penguin Group Inc. and Simon & Schuster Inc., to illegally fix prices of electronic books, also known as e-books, allegedly forcing consumers to pay higher prices.

ABOUT THE PRICE-FIXING ALLEGATIONS

According to the lawsuit, Amazon and the Big Five entered into price-fixing agreements in 2015, which allegedly allowed the Big Five publishers to increase their e-book prices by up to 30% while protecting Amazon from price competition from other e-book retailers.

As a result of this alleged collusion, the plaintiffs all share a similar experience: When they shopped around for better prices on a given e-book title, they instead found uniform, anticompetitive pricing across the internet.

The lawsuit against Amazon states that the e-book retailer violated antitrust and consumer-protection laws by pushing fraudulent price increases onto consumers through illegal pacts with its Big Five co-conspirators that raised the price of e-books on retailer sites that compete with Amazon.

YOUR CONSUMER RIGHTS

The lawsuit calls for monetary reimbursement for consumers who purchased e-books through e-book retailers that compete with Amazon, and also seeks injunctive relief that would require Amazon and its co-conspirators to stop enforcing the alleged anticompetitive price restraints. Hagens Berman believes that those who may have unknowingly paid high prices for e-books sold by Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Macmillan Publishers, Penguin Group Inc. and Simon & Schuster Inc. deserve compensation.

TOP CONSUMER RIGHTS FIRM

Hagens Berman is one of the most successful consumer litigation law firms in the U.S. and has achieved more than $320 billion in settlements for consumers in lawsuits against manufacturers, food corporations, automakers, big banks and others. Hagens Berman has achieved record-breaking settlements in antitrust cases, and your claim will be handled by attorneys experienced in consumer antitrust law. The firm also won a prior class-action lawsuit regarding artificially high prices for e-books, winning $400 million for purchasers in a case that went before the Supreme Court.

NO COST TO YOU

In no case will any class member ever be asked to pay any out-of-pocket sum. In the event Hagens Berman or any other firm obtains a settlement that provides benefits to class members, the court will decide a reasonable fee to be awarded to the class' legal team.

CASE TIMELINE

Court Denies Amazon’s Motion to Dismiss Monopoly Claims

A federal judge granted in part and denied in part Amazon’s motion to dismiss claims that it conspired to monopolize the market for e-books. Judge Gregory H. Woods fully adopted a magistrate judge’s recommendation to allow monopoly claims against Amazon to proceed and dismiss antitrust conspiracy claims.

“Amazon attempts to distinguish itself by arguing that it has no control over its eBook prices,” the order states. “In any case, Amazon cannot disclaim any control over eBook pricing.” The order also states that the complaint “adequately alleges that the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs suffered an injury from higher-than-competitive prices on trade eBooks sold by Amazon.”

Magistrate Judge Recommends Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss be Denied in Part and Granted in Part
Opposition to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Filed

Plaintiffs’ Second Consolidated Amended Complaint Filed

Consolidated Amended Complaint Filed
Amended Complaint Filed

Complaint Filed

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.