Hagens Berman served as court-appointed co-lead class counsel of a class of direct purchasers alleging that GlaxoSmithKline intentionally submitted a sham citizen petitions to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and actually delayed the approval of generic versions of Flonase. The lawsuit claims that GloxoSmithKline stymied the release of the generic of Flonase, fluticasone propionate, by filing multiple citizen petitions with the FDA shortly before the company’s exclusive marketing rights for Flonase were due to expire.
Days before the FDA was set to approve Roxane's abbreviated new drug application for a generic version of Flonase, GlaxoSmithKline began filing petitions to delay approval of any Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) for Flonase until the agency established guidelines to determine the bioequivalency of nasal spray product's alleged abuse of the citizen petition process allowed the company to unlawfully maintain monopoly power and overcharge direct purchasers millions of dollars.
The Flonase Antitrust Case is In Re: Flonase Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Civil Action No. 08-cv-3149
Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.