Bankruptcy Judge Clears the Way for Non-Ignition Switch Claims to Move Forward Against General Motors

06/07/2017

Consumer-rights law firm comments on court’s decision

NEW YORK – In a ruling issued today, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn, overseeing the bankruptcy case involving General Motors Corporation (“Old GM”), cleared the way for the claims of “non-ignition switch plaintiffs” to proceed against General Motors LLC (NYSE: GM) unencumbered by the bankruptcy court’s prior “sale order” barring claims against GM, according to Hagens Berman. 

In June 2009, the bankruptcy court issued the “sale order,” which, among other things, blocked certain legal claims based on Old GM conduct from proceeding against the newly formed GM.  Subsequently in April 2015, the bankruptcy court ruled that claims based on GM’s conduct and brought on behalf of certain “ignition switch plaintiffs” for “serious defects in ignition switches that had been installed in” certain Old GM vehicles were not barred by the sale order, because those plaintiffs were prejudiced by not receiving notice of their claims in the bankruptcy proceeding.

But the court left for another day a decision on whether the sale order barred claims brought by “non-ignition switch plaintiffs” for GM’s own post-bankruptcy conduct.  That day has come.  Today, the court held that non-ignition switch plaintiffs could pursue “independent claims” against GM based solely on GM’s wrongful conduct.

According to attorneys, the decision increases GM’s potential exposure to economic loss claims in class actions and other cases now pending in U.S. District Court before Judge Jesse M. Furman of the Southern District of New York.

“We are very pleased that the bankruptcy court has cleared the way for the district court to evaluate the claims of millions of non-ignition switch plaintiffs seeking recovery for damages associated with GM’s sale of knowingly defective cars and its failure to timely recall the vehicles,” said Steve Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman and co-lead counsel representing GM vehicle owners in the suit.

“GM’s unprecedented recall of more than 27 million vehicles, coupled with revelations that GM had a broken safety culture, caused GM owners—who did nothing wrong—to suffer massive losses,” Berman said.  “Today’s decision means that millions of claims involving other ignition switch defects, power steering defects and defects in side impact airbag systems can be heard in the district court, unencumbered by the 2009 sale order.”

Hagens Berman was appointed co-lead counsel representing owners of GM vehicles in the litigation, which arises from a barrage of safety defects and bungled recalls from GM that irrevocably damaged GM vehicle owners, according to the firm.

# # #

About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP is a consumer-rights class-action law firm with offices in 10 cities. The firm has been named to the National Law Journal’s Plaintiffs’ Hot List eight times. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

Media Contact
Ashley Klann
ashleyk@hbsslaw.com
206-268-9363


Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.

Back to all cases

Case videos

Case Gallery

Case Timeline

09/12/18: GM Case Advances

Today, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York issued an extensive 108-page order allowing claims to move forward for GM owners. The ruling found that manifestation of the defect is not required in order to bring statutory consumer protection, common-law fraud, and implied warranty claims, and addressed the application of prior motion to dismiss opinions on the issues of unjust enrichment and incidental damages.

“We believe that the opinion will be helpful to plaintiffs’ efforts to certify classes and, ultimately, to prevail on the merits. This is a big win for the plaintiffs, as GM told the court this issue would be critical for either side and the ruling is squarely in plaintiffs’ favor.” — Steve W. Berman

Read the court’s opinion and order »

07/23/18: Case Update

On July 20, 2018, Hagens Berman filed a motion to certify bellwether classes in California, Missouri, and Texas. The motion asks the Court to recognize that GM economically harmed the owners of certain GM-brand vehicles affected by safety defects, including ignition switch, power steering, and airbag defects. Even though the class action alleges GM’s misconduct harmed vehicle owners nationwide, this class certification motion includes just three bellwether states to start. The bellwether process aims to resolve class certification for a smaller sample of states, and then apply these outcomes to the remaining states to minimize further litigation.
 

01/18/18: Statement from Steve W. Berman

Statement from Steve W. Berman regarding the U.S. Bankruptcy Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, Signed on 1/18/2018, Regarding Motion to Enforce the Settlement Agreement by and Among the Signatory Plaintiffs and the GUC Trust:

"We are of course disappointed in the result but are thankful that the Court reviewed the issue so carefully and is committed to quickly resolving late claims motions.  All parties will have to assess next steps, including whether Wilmington Trust should be removed as trustee given the Court’s unequivocal findings that Wilmington Trust acted in bad faith."

— Steve W. Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman
representing plaintiffs against GM

 

Read the court's order »

12/19/17: Case Update

Hagens Berman's Steve Berman in Court Fighting GM's Attempt to Kill $1B Ignition Switch Claims Settlement

Read more at Law360 (paywall) »

08/17/17: Statement from Steve W. Berman

“As the documents we filed demonstrate, all parties confirmed we had a deal and authorized us to share that deal with GM. GM then interfered with that deal, and we intend to take appropriate action against GM and possibly those who assisted GM in causing the GUC Trust to breach the contract. In addition, the GUC Trust is a fiduciary to all creditors, including our clients in this case who were denied due process by GM's concealment. The GUC Trust should be acting to protect claimants and not GM.”

— Steve W. Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman
representing plaintiffs against GM

Read the filed letter from plaintiffs' attorneys »

04/24/17: Supreme Court rejects GM bid to block ignition switch suits

On Apr. 24, 2017, the Supreme Court refused to hear GM’s appeal regarding the pending lawsuits concerning the deadly ignition-switch defect linked to 124 deaths and 275 injuries. The automaker had claimed the lawsuits brought regarding the defect were barred by its 2009 bankruptcy. The court’s decision allows the cases to continue for plaintiffs represented by Hagens Berman.

09/15/16: Fourth Amended Complaint

09/15/16 Hagens Berman files fourth amended complaint against General Motors on behalf of hundreds of owners. Download Complaint »

07/13/16: Major Victory: Appeals Court Reverses GM Bankruptcy Protection

The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan ruled that General Motors (NYSE: GM) must face certain claims relating to cars made before its 2009 bankruptcy.

The ruling is a major victory for a class of millions of owners of GM-branded vehicles in the ignition switch multi-district litigation, claiming that the automaker’s series of recalls and cover-ups irrevocably damaged GM’s brand and led to significant loss of vehicle value. read more »

02/10/16: Cooper Motion Denied

"We are gratified that the court found Mr. Cooper’s allegations to be without merit. The court’s ruling allows the Hagens Berman legal team to return to focusing on the cases we are leading against GM." —Steve W. Berman, Managing Partner Download Order »   Read Release »

01/15/15: Steve Berman Responds to Valukas Report:

Regarding GM's internal report from investigator Anton Valukas, Steve Berman responded, "We are disappointed, but at least we get the identification of the witnesses he interviewed who weren’t disclosed. I can also say that after we have been looking at the documents we will show that the Valukas report is flawed and is a serious misstatement of who knew what about the ignition switch defect at GM.”