Case Status
Motion to Dismiss Denied (In Full or in Part)
Case Caption
In re Plantronics, Inc. Securities Litigation
Co-Lead Counsel
Practice Areas
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Case Number
Plantronics, Inc.
Joseph Burton
Charles Boynton
Pamela Stayer
Stock Symbol
File Date
Class Period
Lead Plaintiff Deadline

This is a securities class action on behalf of investors who purchased securities of Plantronics, Inc. (“Plantronics” or the “Company”) from Aug. 7, 2018 through Nov. 5, 2019 (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover damages caused by Plantronics’ and certain of its senior officers’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Headquartered in Santa Cruz, California, Plantronics designs and manufactures lightweight communications headsets, telephone headset systems, and other communications endpoints. The case arises from Defendants’ false and misleading statements concerning the integration and synergistic benefits of Polycom, a video conference equipment provider which the Company acquired on July 2, 2018. Specifically, the Company touted a strong new product roadmap of Plantronics-Polycom products, and said integration of Polycom was “on track” and yielding tens of millions of dollars in synergies. In truth, Plantronics engaged in channel stuffing to artificially boost sales, lacked effective internal control over inventory levels, and failed to monitor inventory levels ahead of multiple product launches such that new models were displacing demand for the Company’s older products. 

The truth began to emerge on Nov. 5, 2019, when the Company disclosed a $65 million reduction in channel inventory “by reducing sales to channel partners” and slashed its fiscal 2020 guidance.  Defendants blamed the inventory reduction on an “aging product line” that would need to be cleared to “prepare for upcoming product transitions.” Plantronics also reported the sudden departure of its Executive Vice President of Global Sales. As a result of these disclosures, the Company’s stock price declined nearly 40%, thereby damaging investors.


Third Amended Complaint is filed

Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

Second Amended Complaint is filed

Amended Complaint is filed
Hagens Berman is appointed Co-Lead Counsel

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.