Trex Company, Inc.

DEFENDANT NAME: Trex Company, Inc.
STOCK SYMBOL: NYSE: TREX
CASE NUMBER: 09-CV-01878
CASE NAME:
COURT: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
PRACTICE AREA: Consumer Rights
STATUS: Settled
CLASS PERIOD:
LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE:
DATE FILED: 01/13/09
COURT LOCATION:

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro filed a class-action lawsuit against Trex Company, Inc., claiming the nation's largest manufacturer of wood-alternative decking sells flawed products and fails to live up to its obligations to consumers when its products exhibit fungal spotting and color issues.  

If you are a Person in the United States or its territories, or a legal representative, heir, successor in interest, transferee, or assignee of such a Person, who owns or owned a Trex Structure built with Trex Product purchased during the period from August 1, 2004 through August 27, 2013, you are a settlement class member.   For purposes of the settlement, “Trex Structure” is defined as a deck, railing, fencing, or other structure built with “Trex Product.” “Trex Product” is defined as Trex non-shelled wood-plastic composite decking, railing, or fencing material sold under the trademarks “Accents®”, “Accents Fire Defense®”, “Origins®”, “Brasilia®”, “Contours®”, “Profiles®”, “Traditional Railing”, “Designer Series Railing®”, “Seclusions®”, or “Surroundings®”. Class members may receive various benefits under the settlement, including monetary and other relief.


Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.

Back to all cases

Case videos

Case Gallery

Case Timeline

12/16/13: Case Settled

This matter has settled. The Court granted final approval to the settlement on December 16, 2013.