Case Status
Active
Case Caption
In re aTyr Pharma Inc. Class Action Securities Litigation
Position
Co-Counsel
Practice Areas
Court
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Judge Assigned
Hon. William Q. Hayes
Case Number
3:25-cv-02681-WQH-SBC
Defendant(S)
aTyr Pharma Inc.
Sankay S. Shukla
Exchange
NASDAQ
Stock Symbol
ATYR
File Date
Class Period
-
Lead Plaintiff Deadline
Phone

The aTyr class action alleges that aTyr and its top executives made false and misleading statements about the efficacy of its drug, Efzofitimod, leading investors to purchase stock at artificially inflated prices.

At the heart of the allegations is aTyr’s Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, known as EFZO-FIT, which evaluated intravenous Efzofitimod in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. The drug was intended to help patients reduce their dependency on steroids.

According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period, aTyr executives expressed overwhelmingly positive statements and confidence in the study’s design, particularly its forced taper approach intended to gauge the drug’s ability to allow patients to completely wean themselves off steroids.

However, the lawsuit claims that concurrently with these optimistic pronouncements, the company was allegedly concealing material adverse facts concerning Efzofitimod’s capability to allow a patient to completely taper their steroid usage—a key measure of efficacy.  The lawsuit asserts that aTyr’s statements crossed the line into securities law violations by allegedly misrepresenting the drug’s true prospects.

The truth, as alleged in the complaint, came to light on Monday, September 15, 2025. Pre-market, aTyr hosted an investor call announcing that the EFZO-FIT study did not meet its primary endpoint: the change from baseline in mean daily oral corticosteroid (OSC) dose at week 48.

The disappointing topline results prompted a swift and brutal market reaction. aTyr’s common stock, which had closed at $6.03 per share on the preceding Friday, September 12, cratered to close at just $1.02 per share on September 15—a catastrophic one-day decline of 83.2%.

In its post-announcement comments, the company stated that it would engage with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to determine a path forward, acknowledging the setback.

CASE TIMELINE

Hagens Berman is Appointed Co-Lead Counsel

Complaint is filed
Media Images
Image

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. This website is informational, not legal advice. Hagens Berman agrees to protect transmitted information in accordance with our Privacy Policy. This site includes attorney advertising and is regulated by the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC).