Center for Diagnostic Imaging

DEFENDANT NAME: Center for Diagnostic Imaging
STOCK SYMBOL:
CASE NUMBER: 05-CV-00058-RSL
COURT: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
PRACTICE AREA: False Claims Act, Health Care Fraud, Whistleblower Litigation
STATUS: Settled
CLASS PERIOD:
LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE:
DATE FILED: 10/14/11
COURT LOCATION:
RELATED DOCUMENTS:
CONTACT:

Case Settled

All the claims in the case have now been resolved. In 2011, the government intervened in the claims, which the company settled for approximately $1.3 million. The government declined to intervene, however, in the no-written-orders and kickback claims, leaving those claims for the whistleblowers and their counsel to pursue on their own. The non-intervened claims have settled for an additional $1.5 million payment to the government. Click to find out more about Hagens Berman's whistleblower practice.

In May 2010, Hagens Berman joined as lead trial counsel a qui tam lawsuit on behalf of two whistleblowers against Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. (CDI), alleging that CDI violated anti-kickback laws and defrauded federally funded health programs by presenting false claims for payment. All the claims in the case have now been resolved.

CDI is a radiology and diagnostic imaging company that owns diagnostic centers in seven states across the country. The company provides commonly used diagnostic services such as MRIs, X-rays and mammograms.

Hagens Berman, along with Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP (“Pietragallo”) and Wilbanks & Bridges, LLP (“Wilbanks”), represented Patricia West, CDI’s former Vice-President of Operations and Business Development for the State of Washington, and Dr. Alexander Serra, the founding partner of Sound Medical Imaging, a servicer of CDI outpatient centers in the Puget Sound region.

West & Serra alleged that CDI defrauded federally funded health programs by (1) improperly upcoding billings associated with epidural injections, (2) billing for services without a written order from the treating physician, a requirement for proper billing according to federal law, and (3) using lease arrangements which disguised improper kickbacks to treating physicians. In 2011, the government intervened in the upcoding claims, which it settled for approximately $1.3 million, 22 percent of which was awarded to West & Serra. The Government declined to intervene, however, in the no-written-orders and kickback claims, leaving those claims for the whistleblowers and their counsel to pursue on their own.

The non-intervened claims have settled for an additional $1.5 million payment to the government. In settling the remaining claims, CDI denied any wrongdoing. United States District Judge Robert S. Lasnik today found that the settlement is in the interest of justice and that a 30 percent award is appropriate, given the contentious nature of the litigation, the good law created, and the risks West and Serra faced in pursuing the case. The award was further justified by the high caliber of legal work completed and public interest in encouraging physicians to come forward and report concerns that they may have about improper billing.

Hagens Berman, Pietragallo and Wilbanks represented the whistleblowers in a lawsuit brought on behalf of the United States government under a law known as the False Claims Act. The False Claims Act allows whistleblowers to sue on the government’s behalf to attempt to recover taxpayer funds lost through fraud. Whistleblowers whose information leads to the recovery of government losses can be awarded up to 30 percent of the funds recovered as a reward.


Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.

Back to all cases

Contact Us

 

Call now for a free legal consultation
888-381-2889

Case videos

Case Gallery

Case Timeline

12/22/06: Case Settled

All the claims in the case have now been resolved. In 2011, the government intervened in the claims, which the company settled for approximately $1.3 million. The government declined to intervene, however, in the no-written-orders and kickback claims, leaving those claims for the whistleblowers and their counsel to pursue on their own. The non-intervened claims have settled for an additional $1.5 million payment to the government. Click to find out more about Hagens Berman's whistleblower practice.

Related News