Did you buy HVAC equipment in the U.S. since 2020 for your home or business building? You may have unknowingly overpaid due to an alleged conspiracy to artificially inflate prices for consumers and small business owners. Fill out the form for more information »

Case Status
Active
Case Caption
Berg v. Robert Bosch LLC. Et al.
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Judge Assigned
Hon. Susan K. DeClercq
Case Number
2:26-cv-10949-SKD-APP
Plaintiff(s)
End-Users/Indirect Purchasers
Defendant(S)
Robert Bosch LLC
Robert Bosch GMBH
JC Residential and Light Commercial LLC
Johnson Controls Hitachi Air Conditioning North America LLC
Trane Technologies PLC
Trane U.S. Inc.
Mitsubishi Electric Trane HVAC US
Carrier Global Corp.
Viessmann Manufacturing Co. (U.S.) Inc.
Daikin Industries LTD
Daikin Comfort Technologies North America
ThermalNetics LLC
Lennox International Inc.
Allied Air Enterprises LLC
Rheem Manufacturing Co.
Heat Transfer Products Group LLC
AAON Inc., a Nevada Corporation
AAON Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation
AAON Coil Products Inc
BASX Inc.
File Date

WHAT’S THE ISSUE?

Hagens Berman has filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of consumers accusing seven of the nation’s leading HVAC manufacturers of conspiring to fix prices of HVAC equipment, including air conditioner condensers, heat pumps, furnaces, air handlers, rooftop units, split systems, chillers and variable refrigerant flow systems. The lawsuit names Bosch, Trane, Carrier, Daikin, Lennox, Rheem and AAON as defendants stating they fraudulently concealed their conspiracy that began in the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, obscuring their unlawful anticompetitive behavior amid supply chain disruptions. The class action accuses defendants of secret meetings, information sharing and more to drive the price of HVAC equipment to “historic levels.”

HOW DO I KNOW IF I’M AFFECTED?

If you purchased HVAC equipment since Jan. 1, 2020, for use in a residential or commercial building, you may be affected. Products include air conditioner condensers, heat pumps, furnaces, air handlers, rooftop units, split systems, chillers and variable refrigerant flow systems. Fill out the form to find out your rights »

Major brand names listed in the complaint include:

  • Bosch (including subsidiaries JC Residential and Light Commercial LLC and Johnson Control-Hitachi Air Conditioning North America LLC)
  • Trane (including subsidiary Mitsubishi Electric Trane HVAC US)
  • Carrier (including Viessmann Manufacturing Co.)
  • Daikin (including ThermalNetics LLC)
  • Lennox (including subsidiary Allied Air Enterprises LLC)
  • Rheem (including its division Heat Transfer Products Group LLC) and
  • AAON (including subsidiary BASX Inc.)

HVAC PRICE-FIXING ALLEGATIONS EXPLAINED

According to the lawsuit, HVAC manufacturers are guilty of exactly what the Department of Justice warned against amid price volatility and supply chain disruptions in 2020: they exploited the COVID-19 supply chain disruptions and regulatory transitions to fix prices and overcharge for HVAC equipment.

“Through a series of frequent and repeated secret meetings, information sharing, communications, and public signaling, Defendants drove the prices of HVAC Equipment to historic levels,” the lawsuit states, and “skyrocketed in just the last few years.”

If you believe you may be impacted by this lawsuit, fill out the form to find out your rights »

The following chart compares the Producer Price Index by Industry: Air-Conditioning, Refrigeration, and Forced Air Heating Equipment Manufacturing: Primary Products to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The lawsuit states, “There is no doubt Defendants were incredibly disciplined, driving prices up to record levels from 2020 through the present, and far exceeding the CPI.”

HVAC

HOW HVAC MANUFACTURERS FIXED PRICES

The alleged conspiracy relied on two key mechanisms:

First, the lawsuit states, defendants used the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI), a trade association for the HVAC industry they largely control, to facilitate the sharing of information available only to AHRI members who also agreed to share their own data with their competitors.

Second, defendants allegedly used the industry publication Air Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration (ACHR) News to announce price increases and provide commentary on their pricing and supply plans.

The 152-page complaint details specific announcements and shared information dating back to 2020, revealing a pattern in which competitor price increases took place in as little as two weeks, demonstrating defendants’ alleged conspiracy. Statements made by defendants include:

  • “Based on everything we have seen so far, we see our competitors aiming at similar price increases.” – Lennox’s CEO Alok Maskara
  • “I don’t want anyone to think that pricing is coming down in that market.” – Trane executive vice president and CFO, Chris Kuhn
  • “[T]he industry’s generally been disciplined for the past several years … . [W]e’re gonna continue to increase our pricing to maintain our margins. I think others have generally been as well. You know, we, as an industry, have realized that, you know, pricing, you know, taking it away, does not win market share.” – Defendant Lennox’s CFO, Michael Quenzer

HVACTogether, defendants control 92 percent of the U.S. HVAC market, which was approximately $31.26 billion in 2024.

YOUR RIGHTS AS A CONSUMER OR SMALL BUSINESS

For most homeowners and small business owners, the purchase of an HVAC system is a necessity and, due to its already steep cost, is often financed through a loan. We believe the HVAC market has been co-opted by powerful companies who sought to illegally manipulate the playing field to extract maximum profits from purchasers.

The lawsuit brings claims of federal antitrust violation for indirect purchasers and seeks to bring monetary relief to HVAC purchasers who may have unknowingly overpaid. Defendants also allegedly violated state consumer protection laws, including those dictating unfair or deceptive trade practices, consumer fraud, unfair competition and restraint of trade. Additionally, the lawsuit seeks injunctive relief to permanently end the alleged price-fixing conspiracy.

HOW CAN A CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT HELP?

Through a class-action lawsuit, individual consumers can collectively bring claims against large corporations that would otherwise have the upper hand, like the few powerful companies dominating the U.S. HVAC market. A class-action lawsuit seeks to level the playing field, bringing strength through collective action to demand meaningful, lasting reform. Though these measures do not bring immediate relief, they are a time-tested method of holding companies accountable for wrongdoing, including companies’ anticompetitive practices.

NATIONAL ANTITRUST LITIGATION LAW FIRM

Hagens Berman is home to some of the most well-respected and successful plaintiffs’ lawyers experienced in price-fixing, monopolistic schemes and other violations of competition law. The firm’s award-winning antitrust team has successfully exposed price-fixing in many markets including batteries; computer memory; commercially sold chicken, beef and pork; e-books and more. Since its founding in 1993, the firm has achieved total settlements valued at more than $345 billion against major institutions, including manufacturers, tech companies, the mortgage market, utility companies and others.

NO COST TO YOU

There is no scenario where any class member will be asked to pay attorney fees or legal costs. In the event Hagens Berman or any other firm obtains a settlement that provides benefits to class members, the court will decide a reasonable fee to be awarded to the class’s legal team.

CASE TIMELINE

Complaint Filed

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Hagens Berman agrees to protect transmitted information in accordance with our Privacy Policy. This website is informational, not legal advice. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. This site includes attorney advertising and is regulated by the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC).