Case Status
Active
Case Caption
Moshell v. Sasol Ltd. et al.
Position
Lead Counsel
Practice Areas
Court
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Case Number
1:20-cv-01008-JPC
Defendant(S)
Sasol Ltd. (NYSE: SSL)
Edward Constable
Bongani Nqwababa
Stephen Cornell
Paul Victor
Stephan Schoeman
Stock Symbol
NYSE: SSL
File Date
Class Period
-
Lead Plaintiff Deadline

This is a securities fraud class action filed on behalf of all purchasers of Sasol ADRs (NYSE: SSL) securities between Mar. 10, 2015 and Jan. 13, 2020, inclusive (the “Class Period”), alleging claims against Sasol Limited (SSL), a South Africa-based energy and chemical company, and certain of its most senior officers.

According to the Complaint, Defendants misled investors by misrepresenting and failing to disclose that: (1) Sasol conducted insufficient due diligence into, and did not account for multiple issues with, Sasol’s  Lake Charles chemical plant (“LCCP”), as well as its true cost; (2) construction and operation of the LCCP was plagued by control weaknesses, delays, rising costs, and technical issues; and (3) Sasol’s top-level management exacerbated these issues by engaging in improper and unethical behavior concerning financial reporting for, and oversight of, the LCCP.

Investors began to learn the truth through a series of disclosures, including on May 22, 2019, when Sasol abruptly raised the project’s cost estimate by $1 billion and disclosed an internal review into the project’s costs and construction schedule.  The company admitted to weaknesses in the project’s integrated controls, as well as significant additional concerns related to the project’s forecasting process.

Then, on Oct. 27, 2019, Sasol terminated its co-CEOs following an internal probe showing that the Lake Charles project management team acted inappropriately, lacked experience, and was overly focused on maintaining cost and schedule estimates instead of providing accurate information. 

Finally, on Jan. 13, 2020, Sasol disclosed an explosion and fire at its Lake Charles project’s low-density polyethylene unit, requiring the company to shut down the unit. 

Each of these disclosures caused the price of Sasol ADRs to decline sharply.

Case Timeline
Title
Hagens Berman is appointed Lead Counsel.
Case Status
Date
Title
The Amended Complaint is filed.
Case Status
Date
Title
The Court denies in part and grants in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
Date
Title
The Second Amended Complaint is filed.
Date

CASE TIMELINE

The Second Amended Complaint is filed.
The Court denies in part and grants in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
The Amended Complaint is filed.
Hagens Berman is appointed Lead Counsel.

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.