Case Status
Settled
Settlement Amount
$169 Million
Position
Co-Lead Counsel
Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Case Number
14-cv-4062-LHK
Defendant(S)
Pixar
Lucasfilm and its division Industrial Light & Magic
DreamWorks Animation
The Walt Disney Company
Sony Pictures Animation
Sony Pictures Imageworks
Blue Sky Studios
ImageMovers LLC
ImageMovers Digital LLC
others
File Date

On June 5, 2017, Judge Lucy Koh granted final approval of the parties’ settlement agreements. Pursuant to these agreements, BlueSky agreed to pay $5,950,000 to the Class; Sony agreed to pay $13 million, DreamWorks agreed to pay $50 million; and Disney agreed to pay $100 million.

The class alleges that the visual effects and animation companies have conspired to restrain competition in order to suppress payment to animators and other related workers, cheating these employees out of bidding competition.

According to the suit, the animation companies secretly agreed to work together to deprive thousands of their employees better compensation and deny them opportunities to advance their careers at other companies, doing so by limiting recruitment activities that otherwise would have existed. This included the companies colluding to not actively recruit employees from each other – an anti-solicitation scheme.

The suit alleges that although the anti-solicitation scheme may have started in Northern California, the scheme metastasized beyond that region. Pixar’s Vice President of Human Resources, Lori McAdams, wrote in 2005: “With regard to ILM, Sony, Blue Sky, etc., . . . we have a gentleman’s agreement not to directly solicit/poach from their employee pool.” Another individual involved in the scheme wrote in an email, “I know you are adamant about keeping a lid on rising labor costs,” according to the complaint.

Case Timeline
Title
$50M settlement reached with Dreamworks
Description

Dreamworks Animation agreed to pay $50 million to settle a class action accusing it of perpetuating a "no poach" agreement with other studios over the hiring of animators.

Case Status
Date
Title
Court approves class certification
Description

U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh certified a class of animation and visual effects workers, allowing the case to proceed as a class action against all defendants.  In an 80-page opinion, Judge Koh found that there was “copious” evidence that the defendants agreed to not solicit other defendants’ employees, and agreed to coordinate compensation policies.  Judge Koh also found that the evidence supported plaintiffs’ argument that defendants’ conduct suppressed compensation across the class of animation and visual effects workers.

Case Status
Date
Title
Case Update
Description

Recently, a settlement was reached with defendant Blue Sky. Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Blue Sky on March 31, 2016.

Date
Title
Motion for Class Certification
Description

Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification.

Date
Title
Amended Complaint
Description

Co-Lead Counsel Hagens Berman files Amended Class Action Complaint

Date
Title
Motion to Dismiss Denied
Description

Judge Koh denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

Date
Title
$169M settlement reached with all defendants
Case Status
Date

CASE TIMELINE

$169M settlement reached with all defendants

$50M settlement reached with Dreamworks

Dreamworks Animation agreed to pay $50 million to settle a class action accusing it of perpetuating a "no poach" agreement with other studios over the hiring of animators.

Court approves class certification

U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh certified a class of animation and visual effects workers, allowing the case to proceed as a class action against all defendants.  In an 80-page opinion, Judge Koh found that there was “copious” evidence that the defendants agreed to not solicit other defendants’ employees, and agreed to coordinate compensation policies.  Judge Koh also found that the evidence supported plaintiffs’ argument that defendants’ conduct suppressed compensation across the class of animation and visual effects workers.

Case Update

Recently, a settlement was reached with defendant Blue Sky. Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Blue Sky on March 31, 2016.

Motion for Class Certification

Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification.

Amended Complaint

Co-Lead Counsel Hagens Berman files Amended Class Action Complaint

Motion to Dismiss Denied

Judge Koh denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.