Case Status
Active
Case Caption
In re Danimer Scientific, Inc. Securities Litigation
Position
Lead Counsel
Practice Areas
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Judge Assigned
Hon. Margo K. Brodie
Case Number
1:21-cv-02708-MKB-RLM
Defendant(S)
Danimer Scientific, Inc. f/k/a Live Oak Acquisition Corp.
Stephen E. Croskrey
John A. Dowdy, III
John P. Amboian
Richard J. Hendrix
Christy Basco
Philip Gregory Calhoun
Gregory Hunt
Isao Noda
Stuart W. Pratt
Andrea K. Tarbox
Tor R. Braham
Jonathan Furer
Harold Ford Jr.
John W. Sweet
Exchange
NYSE
Stock Symbol
DNMR, DNMR WS
File Date
Class Period
-
Lead Plaintiff Deadline
Phone

This is a securities class action on behalf of investors who purchased securities of Danimer Scientific, Inc. (“Danimer Scientific,” “DNMR,” or the “Company”) from October 5, 2020 through May 4, 2021 (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover damages caused by Danimer’ and certain of its senior officers’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Based in Bainbridge, Georgia, Danimer has sold polyhydroxyalkanoates (“PHAs”) commercially under its proprietary “Nodax” brand name for usage in a wide variety of plastic applications including water bottles, straws, and food containers, among others since 2020. The case arises from Defendants’ false and misleading statements concerning its production of polyhydroxyalkanoate (“PHA”) – a biodegradeable alternative to petrochemical-based plastics, which the company sells under its proprietary Nodax brand for usage in water bottles, straws, and food containers. Specifically, the Company touted Nodax as a 100% biodegradable, renewable, and sustainable plastic, which is purportedly superior to traditional plastics because of its advanced biodegradability. The Company attributed Nodax’s advanced biodegradability to microorganisms in nature that eat the bioplastic.

In truth, Danimer had deficient internal controls, had misrepresented, inter alia, its operations' size and regulatory compliance, and had overstated Nodax's biodegradability, particularly in oceans and landfills. The truth emerged over a series of disclosures, beginning on Mar. 20, 2021, when the Wall Street Journal questioned whether Nodax’s breaks down far more quickly than fossil-fuel plastics, finding “many claims about Nodax’s are exaggerated and misleading.” One plastics expert labeled Danimer’s claims about Nodax’s biodegradability as “not accurate” and as “greenwashing.” Next, on Apr. 22, 2021 analyst Spruce Point Capital Management published a scathing report noting: red flags; various inconsistencies about Danimer’s historical and present claims about the size of its operations; Nodax’s makeup and degradability; and the Company’s expected profitability.  Finally, on May 4, 2021 Spruce Point published a follow-up report after acquiring documents from Kentucky’s Department of Environmental Protection and accused Danimer of “wildly overstating” production figures, pricing, and financial projections.  According to Spruce Point, Danimer materially misreported its monthly PHA production for the Kentucky facility by as much as 100% in some months and its average selling price for Nodax’s® was overstated by by 30 – 40%. Each of these revelations sent the price of Danimer shares crashing lower, harming investors.

CASE TIMELINE

Motion to Dismiss Granted

Amended Complaint Filed

Hagens Berman Appointed Lead Counsel

Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.