Toyota Sudden, Unintended Acceleration (SUA)
This case has settled, and checks have been issued to Toyota Diminished Value Claimants. The average check issued was $472.59, the highest check issued was $5,977.00, and the lowest check issued was $125.00. For its work in the case, Hagens Berman was selected as a finalist for the 2014 Trial Lawyer of the Year award.
Hagens Berman was co-lead counsel in this massive MDL alleging that Toyota vehicles contained a defect causing sudden, unintended acceleration (SUA). It was the largest automotive settlement in history, valued at up to $1.6 billion in benefits for class members, which has since been eclisped by the $14.7 billion Volkswagen diesel settlement, in which the firm also took a leading role.
The firm did not initially seek to lead the litigation, but was sought out by the judge for its wealth of experience in managing very complex class-action MDLs. Hagens Berman and managing partner Steve Berman agreed to take on the role of co-lead counsel for the economic loss class and head the plaintiffs’ steering committee.
Hagens Berman worked tenaciously to push the case forward, surviving multiple motions to dismiss despite the inability of researchers, including NASA and NHTSA, to replicate SUA in a lab. The firm continued to fight during discovery, deposing hundreds of engineers and working with experts to analyze millions of lines of computer source code.
Managing partner Steve Berman led settlement negotiations with Toyota, achieving a settlement that is astonishing both because of its value as well as its breadth. The settlement will provide for the installation of brake-override systems in vehicles, $250 million for owners of vehicles that are not eligible for the systems, another $250 million for Toyota owners who sold their vehicles, and a customer care plan for all 16 million current owners that will warranty parts allegedly related to SUA for between three and 10 years.
U.S. District Court Judge James Selna, who oversaw the MDL, called the settlement results “extraordinary” and “exceptional.” He praised Hagens Berman’s efforts, noting as he approved attorneys’ fees and costs that “class counsel has consistently demonstrated extraordinary skill and effort.”
- Settlement Agreement
- Letter from Dean Pines of UMD's Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering 2/20/14
- Preliminary Approval of Settlement 12/28/12
- Order Denying Motion to Compel Arbitration 3/12/12
- Final Ruling on Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Case 5/13/11
- Objection to attempt to file under seal 4/12/11
- Revised Complaint 10/27/10
- Revised Complaint 8/2/10
- Berman Appointed Co-lead Counsel 5/14/10
- MDL Court Order 4/14/10
- Toyota Lease Complaint - National 3/29/10
- New York Conformed Complaint 3/29/10
- Oregon Conformed Complaint 3/29/10
- Ohio Conformed Complaint 3/29/10
- Pennsylvania Conformed Complaint 3/29/10
- Tennessee Complaint 3/23/10
- Massachusetts Complaint 3/23/10
- Illinois Complaint 3/23/10
- Colorado Complaint 3/19/10
- Florida Complaint 3/19/10
- Maryland Complaint 3/19/10
- Washington State Complaint 3/15/10
- Arizona Complaint 3/15/10
Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.