Theranos Fingerprick Blood Tests

DEFENDANT NAME: Theranos Inc.
STOCK SYMBOL:
CASE NUMBER: 3:16-cv-02835, 5:16-cv-03418
CASE NAME:
COURT: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
PRACTICE AREA: Consumer Rights
STATUS: Active
CLASS PERIOD:
LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE:
DATE FILED: 05/26/16
COURT LOCATION:
RELATED DOCUMENTS:
CONTACT:

Did you receive a Theranos fingerprick blood test at Walgreens?

Your test results may have been inaccurate, and you may be entitled to a free accurate replacement test. find out your rights »

According to recent news, Theranos' fingerprick blood tests are substantially more inaccurate than competitors' tests, and results were far enough off they could “result in unnecessary clinical decisions, affecting both patient care and medical research.” Hagens Berman believes consumers deserve a no-cost replacement for Theranos' highly inaccurate testing.

If you received a Theranos fingerprick blood test at any Walgreens pharmacy, contact our legal team now to find out more about your rights to a free and accurate replacement test »


Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. All information contained in any transmission is confidential and Hagens Berman agrees to protect information against unauthorized use, publication or disclosure. This site is regulated by the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct.

Back to all cases

Contact:

Please fill out the form below and we will get back to you as soon as we can.
 
*
*
*
Preferred Contact Method *
*
*
*
*
Select a State *
*
*
*
*
 

Hagens Berman is a national law firm that purchases ads. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship with the firm, but we will make our best effort to keep your information confidential.


Case videos

Case Gallery

Case Timeline

12/31/69: